We are told that internalizing of documentation is very important. And we should document everything we do on each lesson to help us reflect and visualize each activity that was done.
~~~~~
We already have an idea in our mind but how can we do it better and what else can we do?
While we were struggling with this question, we learned something new in today's lesson which is SCAMPER!
So, what is SCAMPER?
SCAMPER is an acronym for
S = Substitute
Substituting part of the problem/product/process for something else.
C = Combine
combining two or more parts of your probortunity (= merging of the word “problem” and “opportunity”) to achieve a different product/process or to enhance synergy.
A = Adapt
Which parts of the problem/product/process could be adapted to remove the probortunity or think how you could change the nature of it.
M = Modify
Changing part or all of the current situation, or to distort it in an unusual way.
P = Put to another use
How you might be able to put your current solution/ product/process to other purposes, or think of what you could reuse from somewhere else in order to solve your own probortunity.
E = Eliminate
What might happen if you eliminated various parts of the product/process/probortunity.
R = Reverse
Think of what you would do if part of your probortunity/product/process worked in reverse or done in a different order.
~~~~~~
We then use SCAMPER to help us generate different chemical ideas.
1. Preparing fried food without the need of Deep-Frying.
2. Elimination of fats and oils from food products when preparing.
3. Instead of being used to prepare food, such as deep-frying, it can also be used to bake pastry.
4. An appliance that can be used in all sorts of food preparation.
5. Prepare food without the use of oil.
6. Prepare food using the convection of air theory.
7. An appliance that does not cost a lot.
8. An appliance that is efficient compared to a microwave.
~~~~~~~
We used the feasibility analysis to screen out impractical ideas from our SCAMPER exercise
Feasibility Analysis
|
Idea : use microwave |
YES |
NO |
|
Budget - Less
than S$2000? |
|
|
|
Project Timeline -
Can be completed within one semester? |
|
|
|
Technical Feasibility - Evaluate the technical
feasibility of the project. |
|
|
|
·
Is the project feasible within the limits of current
technology? |
|
|
|
·
Are the required utilities available? |
|
|
|
·
Does the lab have necessary testing and
fabrication equipment? |
|
|
|
·
Does it need any computer software and
hardware? |
|
|
|
·
Do we possess the necessary technical
expertise and skills? |
||
|
·
Does the lab have sufficient space to support
the project? |
|
|
|
Operational Feasibility |
|
|
|
a.
Does the project team have sufficient manpower
to carry out the project? |
|
|
|
b.
Is it legal to operate the project? |
|
|
|
c.
Is it safe to operate the project? |
|
|
|
Idea : use air fryer |
YES |
NO |
|
Budget - Less
than S$2000? |
|
|
|
Project Timeline -
Can be completed within one semester? |
|
|
|
Technical Feasibility - Evaluate the technical
feasibility of the project. |
|
|
|
·
Is the project feasible within the limits of
current technology? |
|
|
|
·
Are the required utilities available? |
|
|
|
·
Does the lab have necessary testing and
fabrication equipment? |
|
|
|
·
Does it need any computer software and
hardware? |
|
|
|
·
Do we possess the necessary technical
expertise and skills? |
|
|
|
·
Does the lab have sufficient space to support
the project? |
|
|
|
Operational Feasibility |
|
|
|
d.
Does the project team have sufficient manpower
to carry out the project? |
|
|
|
e.
Is it legal to operate the project? |
|
|
|
f.
Is it safe to operate the project? |
|
|
|
Idea : use oven |
YES |
NO |
|
Budget - Less
than S$2000? |
|
|
|
Project Timeline -
Can be completed within one semester? |
|
|
|
Technical Feasibility - Evaluate the technical
feasibility of the project. |
|
|
|
·
Is the project feasible within the limits of
current technology? |
|
|
|
·
Are the required utilities available? |
|
|
|
·
Does the lab have necessary testing and
fabrication equipment? |
|
|
|
·
Does it need any computer software and
hardware? |
|
|
|
·
Do we possess the necessary technical
expertise and skills? |
|
|
|
·
Does the lab have sufficient space to support
the project? |
|
|
|
Operational Feasibility |
|
|
|
g.
Does the project team have sufficient manpower
to carry out the project? |
|
|
|
h.
Is it legal to operate the project? |
|
|
|
i.
Is it safe to operate the project? |
|
|
|
Criteria |
Weightages |
Options |
|||||
|
Idea #1 Microwave |
Idea #2 Air fryer |
Idea #3 Oven |
|||||
|
Raw Score |
Weighted Score |
Raw Score |
Weighted Score |
Raw Score |
Weighted Score |
||
|
a. Cost-effectiveness |
20 |
1 |
20 |
3 |
90 |
2 |
40 |
|
b. practicality |
30 |
1 |
30 |
3 |
90 |
2 |
60 |
|
c. portability |
20 |
1 |
20 |
3 |
60 |
2 |
40 |
|
d. power saving |
30 |
2 |
60 |
3 |
90 |
1 |
30 |
|
Score |
|
|
130 |
|
330 |
|
170 |
No comments:
Post a Comment